Computerization of Public Sector Essay

IntroductionIn the midst of the Global Financial Crisis we found the Mediterranean nations, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, being troubled by serious fiscal issues, great shortage on their balance sheets, characterized by low competitiveness and enormous mankind debt. Over the last year of the GFC the policies that had been followed for those countries are principally center around the creation of fiscal surpass by using horizontal and cross cutting methods. The results of those tactical manoeuvre after almost 4 years of austerity measures are far from favor suitable. One reason for that is that the IMF and EU were unable to look deep into the problem. Their primary target was to found a swift and superficial solution, mainly because of the pressure from the markets and political figures. On this explore we will focus our interest deeper into the problem and attempt attain the core of it. One very important aspect of the crisis that the mentioned organizations amaze not take n into account is the power of the humans domain on the problematic countries. If the public sector misss on cleverness then the results would be phenomenon like corruption, unorganized departments, tax evasion and absence of communication between agencies. One great operator that determines the efficiency of a state is the computerization of its public sector. And that is what our explore will be focused on. main(prenominal) books used on the exploreTo reach the needed results we wealthy person to find the proper literature, we have to use that as a base for our research and to help us on extracting our conclusions. We need to die the structure of the Public Sector Management on those countries and to learn how important the role of computerization is on an efficient government. That is exactly what (Dunleavy, 2006) tried to show us. How vital computerization is for the public administrator and its role on key factors like taxation, decentralization, bureaucracy and publ ic corruption. Another aspect we have to use on our literature research is the quality on public sector.What is its relation with a computerized state how is affected by that. superior is an important element of a successful computerization process, their bonds are strong, quality is considered fundamental for a public sector to be abide by to a greater extent efficient and to increase its performance (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 1995). Performance is another important factor that has a crucial role on a healthy public sector. It helps to increase its effectiveness, that leads to a much transparent and innovative system (Bruijn, 2006). After we successfully incorporate those components into the public governing body we would be able to observe the impact of computerization on the economic stability of a coun taste (Snellen et al., 1989). Advantages of a computerized public sectorIf we look into the literature we will see that the Mediterranean states that are deadlocked, actually apa rt from their deficit they have one more common thing, their corruption ratings (Transparency international, 2011 OECD, 2011). Therefore we observe a great proportionality of tax evasion, and restrict bureaucracy (World Bank, 2012) and low competitiveness against other states (Klaus Schwab, 2012). The advantage of a computerized public sector, apart from the efficiency (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 1995), is the addition on effectiveness too (Willcocks and Harrow, 1992). Moreover we survey a great advance on transparency (OECD, 2011) and on accessibility of the services as well as on productivity (Hayes, 1977).All the previews factors are on a sequence, first of all the immediate reaction of a computerized sector is to improve its quality (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 1995), that is conceivable through an adaption of impudently public management standards (Hood, 1998), next step is the advantage of performance (Margetts, 1999)(Dunleavy, 2006). Moreover after we succeed on adapting quality and performance into the public sector, the effectiveness (GAO,1991) and the efficiency occurs (Willcocks and Harrow, 1992). As a result an economic stability will commence (HMSO, 1983)(Klein, 1988). All the above have shown that will result on a better tax administrator (Snellen et al., 1989)(Naur, 1974) and have as an take the better taxation (Margetts, 1999). Still the most important thing that gets neutralized is the political interception (Herring, 1967).ArgumentsThe main arguments almost computerization of the public sector directs from the employees. A factor is the poverty of knowledge about the use of new technologies and their lack of interest on learning them. Another important factor is the political and union interests (Transparency international, 2011). On the above mentioned countries, unions and political parties have a client relationship. This suggests a major concern for an improvement travail of public sectors administration.Managers lack the will to adapt inn ovative ideas into their departments. And the corrupted bureaucratic states roots are so deep that ought great effort to overcome those obstacles. (Jorma, 1988). Other arguments come from the cost of a computerization update (Dunleavy, 2006). Furthermore, arguments about the part that computerization had on the instability of the Mediterranean States are expressed from organizations like IMF, on their monthly reports they do not take into account the identity operator and the complexity of the public sector on those countries (IMF, 2012).MethodologyFor the research to be conducted we have to use a combination of quantitative, by using the N data sets and qualitative methods by the use of enquiries. Because of the nature of the research some factors cannot be properly valued by quantitative methods (Weber et al., 1946) And some information are results from qualitative research (Ragin and Amoroso, 2011)(Ragin, 1987). Also we have to take into account the external factors that affect the computerization process. Thus the research will not be immune to external elements.ConclusionTo conclude we have reached a top dog on introducing austerity measures on the Mediterranean Countries, where we should be very careful of our actions. Especially when the EU is on a dense position because of political rivalries, unwillingness and antagonism amongst union states. And portray a lack of focus to the core of the issue. If we do not act more carefully and if we do not try to find the right questions for the problem the situation will become irreversible.The question should not be how to spare the deficit, instead should be how those problematic countries can improve their public sector? And more specifically at what extend the computerization of public sector in Mediterranean Nations affect their economic stability? It should be appropriate to close with a quote from Simon H. A is the resistance it evokes from those who refuse to see in it anything more than an enlarged de sk calculator. Not since the Darwinian controversy of the past century we have seen such a concupiscent defense of the uniqueness of man sic against claims of kinship by systems that dont belong to his species. (Simon H.A, 1973 503)ReferencesBRUIJN, J. A. D. 2006. Managing performance in the public sector, New York, NY, Routledge. DUNLEAVY, P. 2006. Digital era governance IT corporations, the state, and E-government, Oxford, Oxford University Press. GAO. 1991a. SSA Computers Long Rans Vision Needed to Guide proximo systems modernization efforts, GAO/IMTEC P1- 44, Washington DC. HAYES, F. O. R. 1977. Productivity in local government, Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books. HERRING, P. 1967. Public administration and the public interest, New York,, Russell & Russell. HMSO. 1983a. efficacy and Effectiveness in theCivil Service, HMSO, London HOOD, C. 1998. The art of the state culture, rhetoric, and public management, Oxford New York, Clarendon Press. IMF. DECEMBER 2011. IMF demesne cut across No. 11/351, Greece Fifth Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, Rephasing and Request for Waivers of Nonobservance of Performance Criteria Press rid on the Executive Board Discussion and Statement by the Executive Director for Greece., Washington, D.C. IMF. JULY 2012. IMF Country authorship No. 12/168, Italy Selected Issues, Washington, D.C. IMF. JUNE 2012. IMF Country Report No. 12/137, Spain Financial Stability Assessment, Washington, D.C. KLAUS SCHWAB. 2012. WEF Global fighting 2012-2013, Geneva, World Economic Forum. KLEIN, R & CARTER, N. 1988. Performance Measurement a review of concepts and issues. Discussion Paper No 18, Public Finance Foundation KUOPUS, JORMA. 1988. Hallinnon lainalaisuus ja automatisoitu verohalliuto, Jyuaskyla, Finnish Lawyers Publishing Company MARGETTS, H. 1999. Information technology in government Britain and America, London New York, Routledge. NAUR, P. 1974. Concise survey of computer methods, New York, Petrocelli Books. OECD. 2011. O ECD Working on Bribery, Annual Report 2011POLLITT, C. & BOUCKAERT, G. 1995. Quality improvement in European public services concepts, cases and commentary, London Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage. RAGIN, C. C. & AMOROSO, L. M. 2011. Constructing social research the unity and diversity of method, Los Angeles, SAGE Publications. RAGIN, C. C. 1987. The comparative method moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies, Berkeley, University of calcium Press. SIMON H,A . 1973. Applying Information technology to organization Design, Public Administration Review, 33 268-78 SNELLEN, I. T. M., DONK, W. B. H. J. V. D. & BAQUIAST, J.-P. 1989. Expert systems in public administration evolving practices and norms, Amsterdam New York, Elsevier Science Publishers. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. 2011. Corruption Perception Index 2011 WEBER, M., GERTH, H. H. & MILLS, C. W. 1946. From Max Weber Essays in sociology, New York,, Oxford university press. WILLCOCKS, L. & HARROW, J. 1992. Rediscovering public services management, London, McGraw-Hill. WORLD BANK. 2008. WORLD BANK Doing Business 2012, http//www.doingbusiness.org/rankings, last checked 29/10/2012